Dr. Daniel Okafor, MD
Internal Medicine
Twenty years in internal medicine. Reviews label language and how we describe botanical benefits, keeping claims honest and compliant with a supports-not-cures standard.
Advisory board & editorial process
The people who review what we publish
Our advisory board reviews Glycovit for label accuracy and honest communication. They do not make medical claims, and they are compensated for their time, not for endorsements.
Lucia Marchetti, RDN
Registered Dietitian Nutritionist
Advises on serving sizes, everyday-use guidance, and how the drops fit alongside balanced meals and activity.
Samuel Hale, MS
Herbal Sciences
Focuses on botanical identity, extract standardization, and sourcing so the label reflects what is actually in the bottle.
How a page gets published
Our editorial process in four steps
- 1
Draft
A writer with subject knowledge drafts each page from primary sources and our formula documentation.
- 2
Advisory review
An advisor checks the page for accuracy, dosage correctness, and compliant language. Anything that overstates a benefit is rewritten.
- 3
Compliance pass
We confirm the supports-not-cures standard, add the required disclaimers, and verify that figures match the rest of the site.
- 4
Dated correction policy
If we find an error after publishing, we correct it and note that the page was updated. Accuracy beats marketing every time.
Why this matters
A supplement brand earns trust in the small print, not the headline. By putting real reviewers between our drafts and your screen, we keep Glycovit honest about what it can and cannot do. If you ever spot something that reads like an overstatement, tell us at support@glycovitofficial.com and we will take a fresh look.